The assessee, an event management company, engaged
the services of a non-resident agent to bring the foreign Artists to
India. The assessee paid remuneration to the Artists and commission to
the agent. It deducted tax on the amounts paid to the Artists but did
not deduct tax on the commission paid to the agents. - Sum paid to agent
could not be deemed to have arisen from the personal activities in a
contracting State in status of entertainer or athlete - Commission paid
to the agent was not hit by Article 18(2) of India-UK DTAA, and,
therefore, income arising to
agent couldn't be said to be taxable in India - Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) v. Wizcraft International Entertainment (P.) Ltd. (2014) 45 taxmann.com 24 (Bombay)
SECTION 92C |
TRANSFER PRICING - COMPUTATION OF ARM’S LENGTH PRICE |
|
SERVICE TAX |
SECTION 65(27) |
TAXABLE SERVICES - COMMERCIAL TRAINING OR COACHING SERVICES |
|
CENTRAL EXCISE ACT |
SECTION 35G |
APPEALS - MAINTAINABILITY OF |
|
|
| SECTION 35K |
APPEALS - BINDING NATURE OF PRECEDENTS |
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment