We informally talk about Tax specially about Indian Income-tax Act, 1961, GST,FDI, Corporate Law and allied laws. The other motive is also to keep fellow professionals, entrepreneurs, NRIs, Foreign Investors and students updated. A place to share the common point of interest 'TAX' because sharing is caring!
Monday, 18 August 2014
MCA circular for Settlement Scheme
Tuesday, 22 July 2014
Entire CMA (Cost Accountants of India) Council resigns
A letter has been addressed to Arun Jaitley by the CMA Council that Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has laid down regressive rules which are below expectations. Also while framing these rules, the Institute was not taken into conidence and neither any representation was considered before finalising the said rules.
On Moral ground, for failure to change the said regressive rules, all the Central Council members have submitted their resignations.
Is Cost Audit losings its relevance :
http://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/is-cost-audit-losing-its-relevance-114072000752_1.html
Thursday, 29 May 2014
MCA to be part of Finance Ministry
After a decade of independent existence, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) will now be clubbed with the Finance Ministry.
Earlier the MCA, which was known as Department of Company Affairs, was under the Finance Ministry. In May 2004, the Department was made the Ministry of Company Affairs, with a separate Minister.
Three year later, in May 2007, it was renamed as Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA).
The apex bodies for chartered accountants, cost accountants and company secretaries as well as country's fair trade watchdog Competition Commission of India (CCI) are within the ambit of Ministry of Corp. Affairs.
Wednesday, 21 May 2014
Multiple DINs fiasco for Congress
As the beleaguered Congress president Sonia Gandhi and her family brace themselves to face life without power, with the party seeking a change in leadership and the nation demanding greater scrutiny of the affairs of a family that presided over one of the most corrupt regimes in independent India, Priyanka Vadra is preparing to enter public life by bringing down the curtain on her mysterious financial dealings.
Seeing the writing on the wall, Priyanka Vadra had quietly admitted to the Union Ministry of Corporate Affairs that she had made multiple DIN applications, “due to inadvertent mistakes which were unintentional”. She submitted that since default under Section 266C is compoundable under Section 621A of the Companies Act, 1956, she would like to be let off with a fine. In a letter to BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, who had made a criminal complaint in the matter, the Union Ministry of Corporate Affairs on May 16, the day the results of the 2014 election voted the Congress-UPA out of office, stated that the matter was under examination.
No Priyanka Vadra, you are not a victim
The Ministry added that scrutiny showed that the multiple DIN applications made by Karti Chidambaram were intentional and that the case prima facie attracts provisions of Section 266A of the Companies Act, 1956. The Ministry’s Regional Director (NR) has been asked to seek explanations from Karti Chidambaram as per established procedure, within 15 days, after receipt of which further action, if any, would be decided. This seems to augur ill for the son of the former Union Finance Minister.
In a statement, Subramanian Swamy said that under the Companies Act, the multiple DINs of Priyanka Vadra and Karti Chidambaram were illegal as the Director Identity Number (DIN) is like a passport or driving licence number and aims to identity an individual’s multiple directorships in different companies to be collated for the purposes of compliance with the Income-Tax Act. Hence multiple DINs are a criminal offence and carry six months imprisonment and a fine of Rs 50,000/.
Priyanka Vadra must leave her Lodhi Estate bungalow
Moreover, multiple DINs are possible only with multiple PAN numbers, which is also illegal. The Union Ministry of Corporate Affairs has found that both Priyanka Vadra and Karti Chidambaram are guilty of this offence. While Priyanka Vadra has admitted the offence and pleaded to be let off with a fine, the matter clearly warrants complete scrutiny of her financial dealings before the case is closed.
It may be recalled that the Ministry of Corporate Affairs’ website showed that Priyanka Vadra had applied for and received three DIN numbers (01038703, 01840144 and 02914391), which violates both the Company Act and the Income Tax Act. As her mother-in-law Maureen Vadra also has two DIN numbers (01840680 and 01839769) a scrutiny of their corporate dealings is clearly in order before they are allowed to surrender the identities and let off with fines.
The DIN is issued against application to be appointed as a director of a company, so the companies against which the multiple numbers were sought must be clearly identified and Income Tax authorities satisfied that no dues are pending. The related issue of multiple PAN numbers must also be clarified in the case of all persons found to be having multiple DINs. It bears noting that all these multiple identities would have been taken against different addresses, otherwise the Ministry would automatically detect the duplication and reject it.
Mrs Vadra is in trouble and knows it
Other Congress leaders having multiple DINs include former Minister for External Affairs Salman Khurshid (02006329 and 02707104); former Minister for Corporate Affairs Sachin Pilot (01492084 and 01720862); Senior Advocate and Congress spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi (00919369, 01282249, 01602963 and 01432612); former Punjab Chief Minister Amarinder Singh (01892589 and 01892590); and former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister and Rajya Sabha Member Motilal Vora (00494585, 00494926, 00589006 and 00628348).
Then, there is Congress’s Sivaganga candidate, Karti Chidambaram (01648557, 00952694, 01632067, 01204813, 01341858 and 01648562) and his mother Nalini Chidambaram (01732369 and 02770705)
Source : Unknown/Unconfirmed
Saturday, 17 May 2014
MCA to take action against erring professionals
v
General Clrcular- lO I 2Ol4
File No MCA21/2a /20r4-E-gov
Govemment of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
"A" Wing, Sfr Floor, Shastri Bhawan
Dr R. P. Road, New Delhi-110O01
Date: - O7.O5.2O 14
To,
All Regional Director
All Registrars of Companies
Sub: - Certification of E-forms / non e-forms under the COmpanies Act, 2013 by the Practising professionals regarding: 1
Sir,
The Ministry has allowed registered Members of the professionals bodies (the
ICAI, ICSI and the ICOAI) to authenticate correctness and integrity of
documents being filed by them with the MCA in electronic mode. Details of
documents required to be certifled have been given in the notification dated
28l04l2OI4 available on the MCA portal.
2. In this regard attention is invited towards the requirement of authentication
oldocuments prescribed under the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees)
Rules, 2014 which elaborate on the responsibility. Further, Rule 1O of ibid
the Registrar is to exarnine e-forms or non e-forms attached and filed with
general forms on McA portal viz. to verit' whether all the requirements have
been complied with and all the attachment to the forms have been duly
scanned and attached in accordance with the requirement of above said rules.
3. Where any instance of filing of documents, application or return or petition
etc. containing false or misleading information or omission of material fact or
incomplete information is observed, the Regional Director or the Registrar as
the case may be, shall conduct a quick inquiry against the professionals who
certified the form and signatory thereof including an officer in default who
appears prima facie responsible for submitting lalse or misleading or incorrect
information pursuant to requirement of above said Rules; 15 days notice may
be given for the purpose.
4. The Regional Director or the Registrar will submit his/her report rn respecr
of the inquiry initiated, irrespective of the outcome, to the D_Governance cell
of the Ministry within 15 days of the expiry of period given for submission of
an explarration witl recommendation in initiating action u/s 447 and.44g of
the Companies Act, 2013 wherever applicable ald also regarding referral of
the matter to the concemed professional Institute for initiating disciplinary
proceedings.
5. The E-Gov cell ofthe Ministry shall process each case so referred and issue
necessary rnstructions to the Regional Director/ Registrar of Compalies for
initiating action u/s 448 and 449 of the Act wherever prima facie cases have
been made out. The E-Gov cell will thereafter refer such cases to the
concerned Institute for conducting disciplinary proceedings against the errant
member as well as debar the concemed professional fro m filing any document
on the MCA portal in future.
6. The Registrar shall forward a fortnightly report to the concemed Regional
Director as well as to the E-Gov Division, Thereafter, the Regional Director
shall forward a consolidated report to the Joint Secretary E_Governance
Division on or before 76 of every month as per the prescribe; proforma (copy
enclosed).
7. This issues witl the approval of tlle Secretary.
Yours faithfully,
1. PPS to Secretary
2. PPS to Additional Secretary
3. PPS to JS(R) / JS(B)i JS(M)/ Drr(ucN)/Drr{BNH)
4. PS to DIR(AB)
tr,M 23387263
cereral Circular- l0l2Ol4 deted O7.O5.2O14
PROFORMA FOR FORTNIGHTLY REPORT BY ROC
PROFORMA FOR MONTHLY REPORT BY RD
FOR THE MONTH OF ..
For the period from......... to ........
SL
NO
NAME OF THE
PROFESSIONAL
MEMBER
OF THE
INSTITUTE
MEMBERSHIP
NO /CP NO.
DETAILS
OF THE
CASE
REMARKS
SI
no
Name of
the ROC
Details of tlle
professional
Membership
no / CP no.
Fact of
the case
remarks
Saturday, 26 April 2014
How to Form an LLP in India
Saturday, 12 April 2014
MCA postpones resuming of EForms submission
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide public notice dated 11th April 2014 stated that all the new e forms under the Companies Act 2013 would be available for uploading from the 28th day of April 2014 (instead of staggered roll out of new e forms from the 14th of April, 2014)
Friday, 11 April 2014
Clarification on Applicability of the Companies Act, 2013 to Auditor's Report to FY 2014-15 and Onwards. - (08-04-2014)
Applicability of the Companies Act, 2013 to Auditor’s Report to FY 2014-15 and Onwards1 |
|
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, on 26th March 2014
notified a majority of the remaining sections of the Companies Act,
2013, including sections 139 to 148, relating to audits and auditors.
The Act was stated to be effective from 1st April, 2014.
Accordingly, queries are being raised by a number of members as to whether any auditor’s report of a company being signed on or after 01st April, 2014 would be in accordance with the requirements of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013. In this context, it may be noted that the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has, on 04th April 2014, vide its General Circular No. 08/2014, clarified that the financial statements (and documents required to be attached thereto), auditor’s report and Board’s report in respect of financial years that commenced earlier than 01st April, 2014 shall be governed by the relevant provisions/Schedules/rules of the Companies Act 1956. This MCA Circular can be seen at URL http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/General_Circular_8_2014.pdf. Therefore, it is clear from MCA’s aforesaid General Circular that the auditor’s report of a company pertaining to any financial year commencing on or before 31st march 2014, would be in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act, 1956 even if that financial year ends after 01st April 2014. For example, where the financial year of a company is 01st January 2014 to 31st December 2014, the statutory auditor’s report signed therefor would be in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act, 1956. As a corollary to MCA’s General Circular, it appears that the provisions of the 2013 Act would apply only to the financial years commencing on or after 01st April 2014. Thus, for example, the statutory auditor’s report signed in respect of the financial year of the company ended 31st March 2015would need to be issued in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. |
Saturday, 5 April 2014
MCA Clarification on Financial Statements, Audit Report for FY 2013-14
The Ministry has vide general circular 08/2014 dated 04.04.2014 clarified that the financial statements, auditors report and Board's report in respect of financial years that commenced earlier than 01.04.2014 shall be governed by the relevant provisions of Companies Act, 1956
Friday, 17 January 2014
33% of registered firms/Companies in India inactive, says MCA
Nearly 33% out of a total of 13.59 lakh registered companies in India are either closed, dormant or in the process of being liquidated, the latest company data released by the ministry of corporate affairs showed on Wednesday.
As per the data, around 9.20 lakh are active companies as on November 30, whereas 2.66 lakh companies have been closed for various reasons, including court order and voluntary winding up.
Another 29,310 firms are in the process of being liquidated, the MCA said in a statement.
As per the statement, there are 1.43 lakh 'dormant' companies that did not file their annual returns or balance sheets for over last three consecutive years.
In order to protect the interests of investors as well as to educate them, MCA organised 306 investor awareness programmes across the country in November last year, it said. With this, a total of 1,107 investor awareness programmes have been organised by the ministry, during the first eight months of the current financial year (till end of November), an official statement said.
As per the ministry, a total of 1,986 investor awareness programmes were organised in the last financial year (2012-13).
"For these programmes, an amount of Rs 5 crore has been earmarked in the budget of the ministry," the statement said.


