Chironjilal
Sharma HUF vs. UOI (Supreme Court)
Pursuant to a search conducted u/s 132, cash of Rs. 2.35
lakhs was recovered. The AO passed an order u/s 132(5) in
which he calculated the tax liability and appropriated the
seized cash. An assessment order was also passed to the
same effect. The AO’s order was finally set-aside by
the Tribunal and it became final. Consequently, the assessee
was refunded the amount of Rs. 2.35 lakhs with interest
from 4.3.1994 (date of last of the regular assessments by
the AO) until the date of refund. The assessee claimed that
he is entitled to interest u/s 132B(4)(b) of the Act for
the period from the expiry of period of six months from the
date of order u/s 132(5) to the date of regular assessment
order. In other words, as the order u/s 132(5) was passed
on 31.5.1990, six months expired on 30.11.1990 and the last
of the regular assessments was done on 4.3.1994, the
assessee claimed interest u/s 132B(4)(b) from 1.12.1990 to
4.3.1994. HELD by the Supreme Court:
The department’s argument that the refund of excess
amount is governed by s. 240 and that s. 132B(4)(b) has no
application is not acceptable. S. 132B(4)(b) deals with
pre-assessment period and there is no conflict between this
provision and s. 240 or for that matter s. 244(A). The
former deals with pre-assessment period in the matters of
search and seizure and the later deals with post assessment
period as per the order in appeal. The department’s
view is not right on the plain reading of s. 132B(4)(b) and
the assessee is entitled to simple interest at the rate of
15% per annum u/s 132B(4)(b) from 1.12.1990 to 4.3.1994.
The interest shall be paid within two months from
today.
No comments:
Post a Comment