Important latest income tax caselaws / judgements

SECTION 2(14)
CAPITAL GAINS - CAPITAL ASSETS

Agricultural land : If a land is adjacent to a municipality and is urban land covered under section 2(14), though municipality and land fall in different States, land will continue to be urban land - Commissioner of Income-tax v. Smt. Anjana Sehgal 40 taxmann.com 485 (Punjab & Haryana)

 

 

SECTION 12A

CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS TRUST - REGISTRATION OF

Founder trustee committed heinous crimes : Where assessee, a public religious trust, made applications seeking registration under sections 12A and 80G, registration could not be declined merely because once upon a time assessee's founder trustee had been accused of heinous crimes and he was awarded life imprisonment - Sri Premananda Trust v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax 40 taxmann.com 514 (Chennai - Trib.)

 

 

 

SECTION 36(1)(iii)

INTEREST ON BORROWED CAPITAL

Interest free loan to related parties : Unless nexus between interest free advance to related party and interest bearing borrowing is established, disallowance of interest would not be justified - Marudhar Hotels (P.) Ltd.v.Joint Commissioner of Income-tax 40 taxmann.com 475 (Jodhpur - Trib.)

  

 

 

SECTION 37(1)

BUSINESS EXPENDITURE - ALLOWABILITY OF 

Repair and renovation expenses : Where renovation expenses included both revenue and capital expenses and it was difficult to bifurcate same, disallowance of 50 per cent of such expenditure as capital expenditure was proper - SICOM Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax 40 taxmann.com 469 (Mumbai - Trib.)

 

 

SECTION 45

CAPITAL GAINS - CHARGEABLE AS 

Capital gains v. Business income : Where under a development agreement with a developer assessee merely realised sale proceeds of capital asset held for 30 years, same would give rise to 'capital gains', and not 'business income' - Marudhar Hotels (P.) Ltd.v.Joint Commissioner of Income-tax 40 taxmann.com 475 (Jodhpur - Trib.)

 

 

SECTION 194H

DEDUCTION OF TAX AT SOURCE - COMMISSION OR BROKERAGE, ETC.

Credit card collection charges : Payment to bank for collecting money paid through credit card is business expenditure - Marudhar Hotels (P.) Ltd.v.Joint Commissioner of Income-tax 40 taxmann.com 475 (Jodhpur - Trib.)

 

 

SECTION 254

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL - POWERS OF

Power to admit additional grounds : Where determination of correct status of assessee impacts ultimate tax liability, such an issue can be admitted for first time before Tribunal even if it was not raised before lower authorities - Income-tax Officer v. Sew Precision Joint Venture 40 taxmann.com 515 (Pune - Trib.)

  

  

  

 

  

 

Arrears received by lawyer who stopped his practice on being elevated as judge not taxable as business income

Arrears of professional fee received by assessee after he had discontinued his legal profession of lawyer on being elevated as a judge of High Court couldn’t be taxed as business income despite insertion of section 176(4) in the Act

In the instant case the assessee was a practising lawyer before his elevation as a judge of the Delhi High Court. He received certain amount of arrears of his professional fees for professional services rendered in the earlier years before his elevation as a Judge of the High Court. The AO held that such receipts were chargeable to tax under section 176(4). On appeal, the CIT (A) deleted the addition made by the AO. Aggrieved revenue filed the instant appeal.

The Tribunal held in favour of assessee as under:

1) As per provisions of section 176(4), in the case of cessation of a profession by a professional, the receipt of any sum after such cessation shall be deemed to be the income of the professional and would be taxed in the year of receipt as if, it had been received prior to the cessation of the profession;

2) Section 176(4) introduces a legal fiction, which should be limited only to the purpose for which it has been created. Section 176(4) merely treats the receipt as the income of the recipient. In the absence of any further fiction in the section, the character of such receipt cannot be determined and no further fiction can be introduced so as to determine the head of charge under which such receipt would fall;

3) Thus, the express language of section 176(4) does not render the receipt to be treated as profit and gains of business or profession (PGBP). Therefore, in spite of introduction of section 176(4) in the Act, the receipts in question couldn’t be treated as the assessee's income falling under the head "PGBP”, even though they were the fruits of the assessee's professional activities;

4) It was due to the absence of any legislative provision that these receipts couldn’t be treated as business income falling under the head "PGBP”. They couldn’t be included in the total income of the assessee, even though the amount was received by the assessee before the discontinuance of his profession due to his elevation as the High Court Judge. Thus, the order of CIT (A) was to be confirmed. – ITO v. Justice Rajiv Shakdher (2013) 36 taxmann.com 585 (Delhi - Trib.)