ITO vs. M K J Enterprises Ltd (ITAT Kolkata)
The term “interest” relates to a pre-existing
debt, which implies a debtor creditor relationship. Unpaid
consideration gives rise to a lien over goods sold and not
for money lent as held in Bombay Steam Navigation Co. Pvt.
Ltd. Vs. CIT (1963) 56 ITR 52 (SC) where interest on unpaid
purchase price was not treated as interest on loan. It is
clear from the definition that before any amount paid is
construed as interest, it has to be established that the
same is payable in respect of any money borrowed or debt
incurred. According to us, discounting charges of Bill of
Exchange or factoring charges of sale cannot be termed as
interest. The assessee in the present case is acting as an
agent.
Now what is this is to be seen. A Del Credere is an
agent, who, selling goods for his principal on credit,
undertakes for an additional commission to sell only to
persons for whom he can stand guarantee. His position is
thus that of a surety who is liable to his principal should
the vendee make default. The agreement between him and his
principal need not be reduced to or evidenced by writing,
for his undertaking is a guarantee. A Del Credere Agent is
an agent who not only establishes a privity of contract
between his principal and the third party, but who also
guarantees to his principal the due performance of the
contract by the third party. He is liable, however, only
when the third party fails to carry out his contract, e.g.,
by insolvency. He is not liable to his principal if the
third party refuses to carry out his contract, for example,
if the buyer refuses to take delivery. In the present case
before us the assessee has assessed the income as Del
Credere being trading in goods and merchandise and also
dealing in securities and which is assessed as income from
business and not income from other sources. The expenditure
incurred is also on account of business expenditure and not
interest expenditure in the nature of interest falling u/s.
194A of the Act.
Accordingly, these discount/factoring
charges do not come within the purview of section 194A and
assessee is not liable to TDS on these charges
No comments:
Post a Comment