In the instant case the AO disallowed
assessee's claim for HRA exemption on the ground that assessee and his
wife were living together and claim of payment of rent by assessee to
his wife was made to reduce his tax liability. The CIT(A) confirmed the
addition on the ground the tenant (i.e., assessee) and landlord (i.e.,
his wife) were staying together which indicated that the whole
arrangement was a colourable device. Aggrieved assessee filed the
instant appeal.
The
Tribunal held in favour of assessee as under:
1)
The section 10(13A) provides that exemption would be allowable to an
assessee for any allowance granted to him by his employer to meet
expenditure actually incurred on payment of rent in respect of
residential accommodation occupied by the him;
2) However, the exemption is not available in case the residential accommodation occupied by the assessee is owned by him or the
assessee has not actually incurred expenditure on payment of rent;
3)
Admittedly, the AO had given a finding of fact that the assessee and
his wife were living together as a family. Therefore, it could be
inferred that the house owned by wife of the assessee was occupied by
the assessee also;
4)
The assessee had submitted the rent receipt(s) and payments had been
duly verified. Therefore, the assessee had fulfilled the twin
requirements of the provision, i.e., occupation of the house and the
payment of rent. Thus, he was entitled to exemption under section
10(13A) - BAJRANG PRASAD RAMDHARANI V. ACIT (2013) 37 taxmann.com 186 (Ahmedabad - Trib.)
No comments:
Post a Comment