The High Court held as under:
Deductor
couldn’t be penalized for non-mentioning of PAN in TDS certificates
issued to payee in Form 16A if payee hadn’t furnished his PAN to
deductor as required by section 139A(5A). Penalty couldn’t be
imposed on assessee under sec. 272B(1) for non-mentioning of PANs of
payees in Form 16A issued to them as there was nothing on record to show
that contractors (payees) to whom certain sums were paid by assessee
after deducting TDS had intimated their PANs to assessee. Default by
payees in furnishing their PANs to assessee would be a "sufficient
cause" for non-imposition of penalty under section 272B(1) – CIT V. GAIL
(INDIA) LTD. (2013) 36 taxmann.com 336 (Allahabad)
No comments:
Post a Comment